Skip to main content

DO CEO's REALLY KNOW WHAT THEIR C-SUITE IS THINKING?

In my more than 36 years of working with executive teams, I used a tool that measured the correlation of how well the various executives at the most senior level, the C-suite, correlated with their CEO on the goals that the CEO had for the organization.

In all those years, I was constantly fascinated by how wide the gap was between the executives and their CEO in the priority of those goals.  In many cases it was as much as 100% from the CEO with some of his or her executives.  To be clear if the CEO had as their highest goal to increase sales by 15%, as an example, and all of the other senior managers in the organization had that as the goal but at lower priorities, then the correlations would not be on target and could be as much as 100% away from the CEO.  I have even seen CEO's with goals like the one I mention and the VP of Sales for the same organization whose main goal was to improve the incentive system for the people in his department.  Now the people doing this correlation use the exact same set of goal statements.  So this company would appear to have a fundamental problem.  Either the VP of Sales was not following the goals set by the leader of the organization or the CEO was not clearly communicating his goals to the organization.  And yes, there indeed could be additional reasons, but overall there are problems in this company/organization that are going to harm the overall productivity of the company.

I always did this exercise very early in my engagement with my clients so that we could resolve the goal setting issues and re-establish them if and when required early in the project. 

Now the "Wall Street Journal" on March 28, 2011 published a short piece by Joe Light which in effect supports the same assertion.  The piece is called "Disconnect Found Between CEO's, Top Officers."  The link to the article follows below:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703362904576218940477788886.html?KEYWORDS=Disconnect+Found+Between+CEO%27s+Top+Officers

The article does not deal directly with goals as my situation did, it's results nonetheless support the lack of clarity that occurs in the communication and dialogue at this high level of management.  The article is based on a 2,463 respondent survey done in December by ExecuNet, Inc., a professional network for executives. 

The survey results indicate that:

  • "14% of CEO's thought their reports stay because they liked the actual work they do;                whereas only 5% of the C-level executives gave that as a reason."
  • "Nearly 13% of Chief Financial Officers, Chief Marketing Officers, and other C-level executives say that having input into company decisions is their top reason to stay with a company...but only 7% of CEO's think that's a central reason their C-level direct reports stick around."

The article and survey continues on with motivation and perception gaps, but whether it is the ExecuNet survey or it is my 35 years of experience, the same thing continues to show up today or yesterday.  There continues to be a major disconnect between the key people that are supposed to be leading the organization.  The result, lower levels of productivity and profitability than There are so many books out today on the subject of Leadership, yet it appears that while people may be reading these book, they are not putting the insights they glean into practice. 

This is typical of what I also saw.  People go to seminars!  They read these books.  They pick up fabulous ideas and are determined to put these great ideas into practice, yet it rarely occurs.  Why you ask?  Because when they get back to the office, the press of business causes these great ideas to became lesser and lesser of a strong priority--so much so that it gets lost under a pile of other to-do's. 

Ah, so how do you fix this?  Check for my next posting. 

Bob

Comments

  1. I must confess; I too am guilt of reading books or papers and discovering some truly wonderful new methods or tactics but failing to take the vital step on actually acting and implementing.

    I mean, I read 'The Good Sex Guide' when I was 18 and I've never put ANY of its recommendations into practice! :)

    Islander

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NEW WEB SITE!!

Hi All--This is not a traditional post, but I wanted you to all to check out my new re-formulated web site at www.jacobson-solutions.com .  It was done with the outstanding help of the design team at www.davidsonbelluso.com .  I am really excited about it.  Still some work to do, but not enough to keep it from the world.  Bob

Oh, My Goodness, is it Affect or Effect?

Oh, My Goodness, is it Affect or Effect?? You know it's got to be good when an article is originally written for and posted from Entrepreneur.com and then is reposted to a Harvard Business Review blog.  From there it is posted to a LinkedIn.com blog and then to my humble publication.  But here it is, a really good piece by Travis Bradberry, the award-winning co-author of the best selling book, "Emotional Intelligence 2.0", entitled "10 Misused Words That Make Smart People Look Stupid." We all have a tendency to throw words around.  They can be big words, important words and many times they are not terribly important words that we run amuck with like--affect or effect.  Bradberry's article and the points he makes in regard to today's millennial's are just as valid as they are with many of today's senior executives as with new hires.  We've lost our ability to be as articulate as we once were.  This occurs in the written as well as the spo

How True!!

In a recent Huffington Post Business posting, Jodie Levin-Epstein could not have said it better in her piece, "Don't Cut Off Your Knows."  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jodie-levinepstein/dont-cut-off-your-knows_b_832286.html Congress is killing our future and any potential increases in productivity by their drastic cuts in education and particularly in worker training.  Their drastic cuts to such programs as the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) and other programs are illogical and so poorly thought out that they are killing our future.  Yes, we may need to cut some of the fat out of our budget, but this is not the place to do it. She says and I quote, "Even though unemployment has declined in recent months, it's still significantly higher than it was before the start of the recession.  Further, given the skills/jobs mismatch that many economists have noted, now is the worst possible time to cut investment in workforce devdelopment programs." Sheer lo