Skip to main content

The Long Lost Leadership in the Illinois Legislature -- Part 2

Image
By


Some recent news for those of you following the goings-on in Springfield.  The governor, Pat Quinn has made a slight step in the right direction, calling the Illinois state lawmakers back to the capitol for a special session on June 19th. 

His impetus,  Fitch Ratings cut the state's credit ratings Monday and Moody's Investors Service did the same on Thursday.  It is now official, Illinois has the lowest rating among all of the U.S. states per the Wall Street Journal, with Moody's analysts quoted as saying the "legislature's political paralysis to date shows not only the magnitude of Illinois' unfunded benefit liabilities, but also the legal and political hurdles to legislation."   In plain speak, they're all a bunch of idiots!!  My interpretation of course. 

This shortfall currently amounts to $96.8 billion dollars.  That's right $96.8 billion dollars and the legislatures left without resolving it at the end of their term rather kicking the can further down the alley and not fixing the problem.  I guess their vacations were more important.  Now if the Governor had acted as the leader he should have, he would have done something similar to the approach I made in Part 1 of this blog.  He should have taken Messers Madigan and Cullerton into a room, locked the door and chained them to the table, not allowing them out until they came to a reasonable, fair compromise to this fiscal nightmare. 

That's what a leader would have done!  But no, not this bunch of clowns.  Now instead the taxpayers have to fund a special session of the legislature, because these three politicos could not get their act together.  I wonder how much this session is going to cost the taxpayers.  Maybe we should make Quinn, Cullerton and Madigan pay for it out of their own pockets.  I can only wonder what they would think of that proposal. 

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 7, 2014 at 11:10 PM

    that's fabulous book of the Software Society.Software and Productivity is so good.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ARE WE TEACHING THE RIGHT THINGS IN GRAMMAR SCHOOL?

By
It was decades ago that I was in grammar school.  Things were significantly different then than they are now.  Of course computers and smart phones were not even in our line of sight as they are today.  I am not questioning the digital revolution one whit, as I believe it is integral to our growth as people, our growth as an economy as well as our growth globally. But I am dismayed by our departure from grammar school years of some of the basics that we used to go through.  I remember one class in particular in 7th grade (about age 12) called Home Economics, in which both the boys and girls had to take.  It was a school year long class and included cooking, sewing, electricity and plumbing.  We all had to learn how to cook some basic foods and as part of the class had to cook a hot lunch for ourselves.  And I am not talking about just opening a can or defrosting someth...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do You?

By
 Do you procrastinate?  I know I do it more often than I would like to admit.  We all have a tendency to procrastinate.  Very recently, I saw this photo in a LinkedIn post.   To be legally clear, this is a billboard type advertisement by Nike. They are very famous for their "Just Do It" slogan.   Now they have two and they have combined both into an even more powerful expression. The definition of "procrastinate" from the Oxford dictionary is: "to delay or postpone action; put off doing something."  It is like the old colloquialism "Manana."  Mañana is tomorrow in Spanish.  We all do it to one degree or another.   From a business perspective, to procrastinate is a terrible situation if you or a great many people in a company or organization do it.  If it occurs too often or too much, then what does it do:  it has the probability to DELAY MOST EVERYTHING.  Is that what you really want?  No, I doubt it.  It very we...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Flaw Of Averages

By
Yes, this post will be primarily a copy of a Harvard Business Review (HBR) article.  The article is the point of this blog. Over my decades in consulting, one of the major requirements in our niche was to insure that our clients received the savings we had forecast that they would achieve in a mutually agreeable manner.  In the very beginning, when I started back in 1974, computers were not easily available or accessible as they had to be huge room-size machines and many clients did not even have them.  So we used adding machines with paper tape to the shortly thereafter personal hand held-calculators.  Personal computers starting with the very first Apple or Radio Shack model proved far superior but had minimal calculating capacity.  None were perfect and because of this limitation, a straight line average over a years period was typically used to compare history to current and prove savings had been achieved. ...
Post a Comment
Read more