Skip to main content

LONG WORK HOURS ARE "THE LARGEST OF ANY OCCUPATIONAL RISK FACTOR CALCULATED TO DATE."

Image
By

 

The title of this blog post comes from a report by the University of Chicago about the excess work time that Americans put in on the job.  An Op-Ed piece in the New York Times by Bryce Covert on July 25, 2021 contains information on this subject that is also readily available from other sources.  

  1.     Apparently Americans log in 7 to 19 percent more time on the job than their European peers.    
  2.     This year, the Spanish government announced a pilot program to entice corporations to try out a  four day workweek without reducing anyone's pay.
  3.     Last month, Japan released economic policy guidelines encouraging employers to do the same thing.
  4.     Iceland just published results from an experiment with a four-day workweek in Reykjavik that  ran from 2015 to 2019 and found that productivity didn't decline and in some cases improved. The reduced schedule showed "that we are not just machines that just work,"  one Icelandic participant said.  "We are persons with desires and private lives, families and hobbies."   Employees reported being less burnt out and healthier.
  5. Sweden has been doing similar experiments too test out the 4-day week.   
We have known for sometime that working too much is not good for us.  It is related to weight gain, more alcohol, tobacco and drug use, but also higher levels of injury, illness and  death,  Other studies show excess work hours correlate to greater amounts of heart disease.   

NPR (the USA's National Public Radio) reported back in 2015 some of the observations made during the great depression by the famed economist John Maynard Keynes,  He predicted 100 yers earlier that by 2030 (9 years from now) that we would only need to work something like 15 hours a week due too technological advances.  So much has changed in the last decade technologically that this Keynes observation may be right on target.  

Both pieces I have included effectively deal with the same issue.  Working too hard is not good for us.  Take a read and gain more insight into these important issues.

Bob Jacobson  7/28/2021

FURTHER READING

From time to time, I will come across sources or additional information about the above topic that you might find useful and worth reading.  

In this case, Iceland tried a shortened workweek and it was reported in Forbes Magazine.  The article on that subject is provided here. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NEW WEB SITE!!

By
Hi All--This is not a traditional post, but I wanted you to all to check out my new re-formulated web site at www.jacobson-solutions.com .  It was done with the outstanding help of the design team at www.davidsonbelluso.com .  I am really excited about it.  Still some work to do, but not enough to keep it from the world.  Bob
3 comments
Read more

BIG BROTHER OR NOT????? WILL THESE TOOLS HELP YOUR PRODUCTIVITY??

By
The Wall Street Journal had a tremendous lead-off piece on their "Journal Report" this week on Monday, April 2, 2012.  It was entitled "Employees, Measure Yourselves."  The introductory picture for this article needs to be seen to be understood, so I have included the link and the article below, but as part of the picture in the newspaper version, 5 questions are asked as part of the picture, that are NOT   included in the picture below as part of the digitized version.  These questions are:         "How much time do I spend on Facebook?      How's my pulse when I get close to a deadline?      How often am I distracted?      Does my work improve when I sleep better?      Do I get more done if I exercise before work?"     All great questions which we would want to know if we are interested in our productivity.  I know I certainly would.  The article when you read it goes on to point out that there are software tools available right now that can
1 comment
Read more

The Flaw Of Averages

By
Yes, this post will be primarily a copy of a Harvard Business Review (HBR) article.  The article is the point of this blog. Over my decades in consulting, one of the major requirements in our niche was to insure that our clients received the savings we had forecast that they would achieve in a mutually agreeable manner.  In the very beginning, when I started back in 1974, computers were not easily available or accessible as they had to be huge room-size machines and many clients did not even have them.  So we used adding machines with paper tape to the shortly thereafter personal hand held-calculators.  Personal computers starting with the very first Apple or Radio Shack model proved far superior but had minimal calculating capacity.  None were perfect and because of this limitation, a straight line average over a years period was typically used to compare history to current and prove savings had been achieved.   I found well into my career that straight-line bases had fallacies in the
Post a Comment
Read more